FAME USA Opens First Chapter West of the Rockies
California’s manufacturing community has several reasons to celebrate.
What’s going on: On July 28, California marked a major milestone: the launch of the first-ever Federation for Advanced Manufacturing Education chapter west of the Rockies. Reedley College hosted both the chapter’s debut and FAME Signing Day, celebrating students who are beginning their journeys in advanced manufacturing.
- California Representatives Jim Fong and Jim Costa were on hand at Reedley on signing day, when the new Central Valley FAME Chapter was announced.
- Students in the new chapter will work part-time jobs this year at manufacturing companies while taking manufacturing-focused classes on campus.
The background: FAME is the highly successful workforce development program founded in 2010 by Toyota and now run entirely by the Manufacturing Institute, the NAM’s 501c3 workforce development and education affiliate.
Years in the making: The new chapter’s establishment was the result of four years of collaboration and commitment.
- Four years ago, Fresno County Economic Development Corporation was part of a cohort that received technical assistance from the MI, learning how to apply for the Good Jobs challenge grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration.
- Three years ago, Fresno County EDC was awarded $23 million, allowing it to expand its work with the San Joaquin Valley Manufacturing Alliance and other regional partners.
- In 2023, Reedley College piloted a short-term manufacturing training program and started a regional listening tour for potential employers.
- Last year, dozens of manufacturers in the valley gathered to determine their training needs and start a local FAME chapter.
The MI says: “This milestone proves what’s possible when education and industry work together: a stronger talent pipeline, better career pathways and a brighter future for manufacturing in California and nationwide,” said Gardner Carrick, chief program officer at the Manufacturing Institute. “It’s proof that when industry and education come together with a shared vision, we can transform communities.”
Get involved: Learn more here about FAME and how you can tap into this global-best training resource. And don’t forget to follow FAME USA on LinkedIn.
Trump Administration Relaxes State EV Charging Facility Requirements
The Trump administration is easing requirements for states’ construction of electric vehicles charging stations (POLITICO’s ENERGYWIRE, subscription).
What’s going on: “The new guidance from the Federal Highway Administration swept away Biden-era dictates that stations be built at certain intervals along highways, and removed goals both big, like uplifting disadvantaged communities, and small, like requiring plans for snow removal.”
- The changes also have the potential to get more than $2 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program funds to various projects starting in September, months after the administration halted the funding.
What it does: The new National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure program rules—which grant states 30 days to submit new EV charging facility construction plans—“give states broader latitude in how they spend their portion of federal money … [which] are allocated to states by formula.”
- States can now spend their money on light-, medium- and heavy-duty vehicle charging, and unlike in the previous administration, which required having facilities every 50 miles, will be allowed to “determine for themselves when their highway charging efforts are done.”
- Plus, by urging states to use their money “at locations where the charging site host and the company operating the chargers are the same entity,” the new regulations also direct funding to existing truck stops and gas stations, which “favors existing traditional filling stations.”
The NAM says: “Manufacturers appreciate the Department of Transportation’s updates to the NEVI program requirements to provide greater flexibility to states and businesses to get this program up and running,” said NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen.
Energy Dept Kicks Off Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program
The Department of Energy announced the start of its pilot program, which will partner with 11 advanced reactor projects, aiming to bolster the nuclear energy industry (E&E News, subscription).
Big goals: The program aims to get a minimum of three reactors deployed by July 4 of next year.
The background: “The announcement comes as the Trump administration looks to reinforce domestic supply chains and expand U.S. nuclear energy capacity to 400 gigawatts by 2050.”
- “The June announcement of the program came shortly after Trump’s executive order calling for reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.”
The participants: Companies involved in the program include advanced nuclear energy company Oklo—which is conducting two advanced reactor projects.
- The 10 companies in total will cover all the costs related to the test reactors, from design through construction all the way to decommissioning, according to the DOE.
The DOE says: “President Trump’s Reactor Pilot Program is a call to action,” said Deputy Secretary of Energy James P. Danly. “These companies aim to all safely achieve criticality by Independence Day, and DOE will do everything we can to support their efforts.”
The NAM says: “Nuclear energy is a safe, emissions-free component of America’s energy dominance strategy. It’s also essential for meeting additional energy needs that have arisen with the growth in data centers and the use of AI,” said NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen.
- “This program will give the nuclear energy industry an important boost—to the benefit of manufacturers and all Americans.”
New Texas-to-Arizona Pipeline Planned
One of the largest midstream energy firms in the world will build a 516-mile natural gas pipeline from West Texas to Arizona (POLITICO Pro’s ENERGYWIRE, subscription).
What’s going on: The planned Desert Southwest line by Energy Transfer —a company best known for its development of the Dakota Access pipeline in the Midwest—”is slated to run along existing pipeline routes, the company said last week, and the project is expected to be completed by the end of 2029.”
- The new line is necessary to serve “population growth, high-tech industry demand and data center expansion,” Energy Transfer said in a statement.
- The Houston, Texas-based company “has a network of 140,000 miles of pipelines and related infrastructure across 44 states” and is developing a liquefied natural gas export terminal in Louisiana.
Significant interest: Arizona utilities have already announced commitments to get gas from the pipeline, which is currently slated to be three-and-a-half feet in diameter but could increase to 4 feet given the significant interest in the endeavor.
- That increase would double the expected capacity of the pipeline.
Prioritizing manufacturers in the U.S.: The new pipeline will create 5,000 new jobs, and Energy Transfer said it would be “prioritizing U.S. steel pipe manufacturers” for the project.
- In addition, the gas from this project will help supply energy to key manufacturing and AI investments being made across the Phoenix metropolitan region—including in semiconductors, automobiles, aerospace, healthcare and biosciences.
The word from Arizona: “Arizona’s economy is growing and becoming more diversified than ever, including a significant increase in advanced manufacturing,” said Arizona Public Service President and CEO Ted Geisler.
- “This new pipeline represents a long-term commitment to reliability, resilience and affordability for customers and supports the unprecedented economic momentum that makes Arizona a great place to do business.”
The NAM says: “Desert Southwest is a prime example of what can be achieved when we embrace an all-of-the-above energy strategy—one that includes harnessing our abundant natural resources,” NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen said.
- “The pipeline will not only create jobs and business for U.S. manufacturers, it will also help reinforce the regional electrical grid at a critical time of explosive growth so more Americans can enjoy reliable baseload power.”
Trump Extends Suspension of “Reciprocal” Tariff Rates for China
President Trump signed an executive order that keeps the 10% additional International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariff rate on China until Nov. 10 while negotiations continue.
The background: On March 5, IEEPA Fentanyl tariffs of 20% went into effect on goods from China. An additional IEEPA Reciprocal tariff rate of 10% was imposed on goods from China on April 9, which quickly escalated to 125% as China retaliated and the U.S responded in tit-for-tat announcements.
- In mid-May, the U.S. agreed to reduce its additional IEEPA Reciprocal tariff rate on China to 10% from 125%. China also reduced its retaliatory rate to 10%.
Other tariffs: The U.S. will retain all tariffs imposed on China prior to April 2, including Section 301 tariffs, Section 232 tariffs, IEEPA Fentanyl tariffs and Most Favored Nation tariffs.
CBP Guidance: U. S. Customs and Border Protection has already issued guidance which can be accessed here.
To Increase Aluminum Supply, Recycle More
To bolster domestic aluminum supply chains, the U.S. may need to simply do more of something we already do: recycle (The Wall Street Journal, subscription).
What’s going on: “U.S. primary aluminum production has dwindled over the past 25 years. Yet facilities like Hydro’s two-year-old plant in southwest Michigan have made the country a leading producer of secondary aluminum from scrap, feeding metal to brewers, builders and automakers.”
- “Recycling is the answer,” said Duncan Pitchford, who heads Norsk Hydro’s upstream aluminum business in the U.S. and is an NAM board member. “The metal is already here.”
Why it’s important: While construction of a new aluminum smelter to make primary aluminum from refined bauxite would take years and require an investment of billions of dollars, aluminum recycling plants can be built relatively quickly and inexpensively.
- They also use less energy, according to Pitchford.
The impact of tariffs: Recycling makes economic sense for the U.S. given the new 50% tariff on aluminum imports.
- “The added cost is walloping beverage companies and manufacturers … [but] [a]utomakers and other big aluminum users have yet to raise prices much in response.” according to the Journal.
- “Analysts say it is a matter of time before the stockpiles of metal that arrived in the U.S. ahead of the June increase are depleted and companies start passing on higher aluminum costs.”
The challenge: Americans are catching on to the importance of aluminum recycling, with 14 “remelt” projects announced in the U.S. since 2022. Still, “[m]ore than $1 billion worth of beverage cans were dumped in U.S. landfills just last year … A lack of sorting operations means that a lot of the aluminum in junked cars, demolition debris and old electronics winds up in landfills.”
- The U.S. also exports much of its aluminum scrap, sending about 2.4 million metric tons overseas in 2024.
The way things were: “The U.S. once dominated the aluminum business. … [and] remained the world’s top producer through 2000,” when smelters began to shutter, “squeezed” by less expensive imports and increasing energy pieces.
The electricity factor: Electricity costs make up about 40% of the price tag for the creation of new aluminum.
- For many years domestic smelters received low-cost hydropower from federal utilities, but when those arrangements ended, smelters had to begin paying market rates for their electricity.
What Hydro’s doing: Approximately 15 million pounds of scrap — including “shredded cars, old window and door frames and overhead electrical wire”— arrives at Hydro’s Michigan plant each month for recycling. (The facility does not recycle cans.)
- Much of the metal the plant takes in comes from “a sorting hub near Grand Rapids, where Hydro uses laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy technology to mechanically separate scrap by alloy.”
Factory Shipments Increase in June, Unfilled Orders Rise
New orders for manufactured goods declined 4.8% in June, following an 8.3% increase in May. On the other hand, new orders for manufactured goods grew 3.8% over the year. When excluding transportation, new orders inched up 0.4%. Orders for durable goods plunged 9.4%, following a 16.5% increase in May. Year to date, durable goods orders are up 7.9%. Nondurable goods orders rose 0.5% in June after ticking up 0.1% in May. Nondurable goods orders are down 0.1% over the year.
New orders for nondefense aircraft and parts, which have been incredibly volatile in recent months, led the decrease in durable goods orders, diving 51.8%, following May’s 231.6% surge. In June, the largest monthly increase occurred in industrial machinery, which jumped 6.9%, after rising 2.3% the prior two months. The largest over-the-year changes also occurred in nondefense aircraft and parts (up 175.9%) and defense search and navigation equipment (down 7.5%).
Factory shipments increased 0.5% in June, after rising 0.2% in May. Shipments over the year rose 1.0%. Shipments excluding transportation ticked up 0.4% in June, following a 0.1% rise the previous month. Shipments for durable goods improved 0.5% in June, following a 0.3% increase in May, and are up 2.2% year to date. Meanwhile, nondurable goods shipments advanced 0.5% after inching up 0.1% the prior month but are down 0.1% year to date.
Unfilled orders for all manufacturing industries rose 1.0% in June, after increasing 3.4% in May. Unfilled orders over the year jumped 7.2%. Inventories ticked up 0.2%, after inching up 0.1% the prior month, and the inventories-to-shipments ratio remained the same at 1.57. The unfilled orders-to-shipments ratio for durable goods increased to 7.03 from 6.98 in May.
Manufacturers Host Lawmakers, Celebrate Tax Reform Victory
Manufacturers in Pennsylvania and New Jersey welcomed Republican representatives to their facilities this week, thanking them for delivering a landmark victory for manufacturers: the passage of H.R. 1.
- House Republican Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain (R-MI) and local Reps. Tom Kean (R-NJ-7), Rob Bresnahan (R-PA-8) and Ryan Mackenzie (R-PA-7) participated in the factory tours as part of Chairwoman McClain’s One Big Beautiful Tour.
NAM in action: NAM Executive Vice President Erin Streeter accompanied lawmakers, highlighting how the Manufacturing Law is already having positive impacts on local manufacturing.
- “Manufacturing is the backbone of the American economy—and with the leadership of Chairwoman McClain, Reps. Kean, Bresnahan, Mackenzie and their colleagues in Congress—that foundation is stronger than ever,” Streeter said following the visits.
- “By championing the Manufacturing Law, Congress has protected nearly 6 million jobs and more than $500 billion in wages for hardworking Americans. We thank them for their leadership.”
New Jersey: Chairwoman McClain and Rep. Kean toured Bihler of America , a manufacturer of precision automation systems in Phillipsburg, New Jersey. The company specializes in complex metal stamping, forming and assembly solutions, serving industries such as automotive, medical and consumer products.
- “Manufacturers thrive when we have the certainty we need to plan major investments in our facilities and our people. That’s exactly what this tax package delivers,” said Bihler CEO Maxine Nordmeyer.
- “We thank our partners in Congress and the administration—and we look forward to working with them on a full comprehensive manufacturing strategy. Through energy, trade and workforce policies that drive our competitiveness, deliver certainty and empower manufacturers, we will build on the success of the One Big Beautiful Bill.”
Pennsylvania: Rep. Bresnahan joined Chairwoman McClain for a tour of i2M , a manufacturer of flexible polymers in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania. The company produces custom polymer films and sheets used in a variety of applications, including agriculture, construction, packaging and geomembranes.
- “Manufacturers are innovators. By restoring immediate R&D expensing for manufacturers across America [a key provision of the OBBBA], Congress has empowered manufacturers like i2M to innovate and create,” said i2M Founder Chris Hackett.
- “That’s how we keep our competitive edge—not just as a company, but as a country.”
Pennsylvania, round 2: At another stop in the Keystone State, Rep. Mackenzie joined the tour at U.S. Metal Powders in Palmerton. The visit highlighted the company’s recent expansion, including a new state-of-the-art production line that will create new jobs and boost aluminum powder output for global markets.
- “Thanks to this transformative tax legislation, U.S. Metal Powders has already broken ground on adding another production line—which will soon double the company’s workforce. This is pro-growth tax policy in action,” Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association President and CEO David N. Taylor said in response to the visit.
NAM in the news: The White House’s rapid response account on X highlighted Rep. Bresnahan’s visit to Pennsylvania and appearance on the area’s local Fox affiliate.
- Fox Business Network’s Maria Bartiromo cited the NAM’s partnership on the tour in an interview with Chairwoman McClain.
- The House GOP X account shared a video of Streeter talking about the facility visits.
- Chairwoman McClain posted about her visits to Bihler of America, i2M and U.S. Metal Powders on X. Chairwoman McClain, along with Reps. Bresnahan and Kean, also amplified the NAM’s own social posts.
- WVIA covered the visit to i2M.
The Wall Street Journal: Say No to Drug Price Controls
The U.S. is making huge strides in the medical and biopharmaceutical fields, but price controls threaten this progress, a recent Wall Street Journal editorial asserts (subscription).
What’s going on: “President Trump … last week threatened drug companies with price controls or worse if they don’t cut prices as he wants,” the editorial board wrote. “Mr. Trump’s excuse is that other countries are ‘free riding’ on American innovation. His solution: Demand manufacturers give Americans their “most-favored nation” (MFN) price—i.e., the lowest in other developed countries like Canada and the U.K. If drug makers refuse, he may yank their drug approvals, harass them with lawsuits and more.”
Why it’s a problem: While nations with single-payer health care systems, such as Canada and the U.K., pay less for prescription pharmaceuticals than American private insurers and Medicaid, “[d]rugs aren’t the main driver of health care premiums, patient costs or government spending.”
- “Manufacturers benefit for a few years from patent protection after medicines launch, but then they face stiff competition from follow-on medicines and generics.”
- Unbranded generic medications account for 90% of all prescriptions in the U.S. and cost just one-third less here than they do in other countries.
What really works: Market competition, not price controls, is what will bring costs down for consumers, the editorial continues.
Discouraging innovation: It isn’t true that pharmaceutical manufacturers get “generous research subsidies,” as the president recently claimed.
- In fact, “the pharmaceutical industry spent $141 billion on research and development in 2022, nearly 40 times as much as the National Institutes of Health did on research directly related to drug development.”
- Harassing companies the way Trump is doing, according to the piece, could make them move more of their intellectual property to China—and that’s a move that would “likely result in fewer new drugs developed and sold in the U.S., especially in riskier research fields like neurologic and rare genetic diseases.”
NAM says: “European-style price controls will stifle innovation—undermining R&D and limiting future access to breakthrough treatments,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a statement last week.
- “Manufacturers and manufacturing workers are facing rising health care costs because of underregulated middlemen like [pharmacy benefit managers] and the 340B program, both of which have increased prices for patients without producing a single treatment. Rather than punishing the innovators who develop lifesaving and life-changing medicines, policymakers should focus on the real inefficiencies and distortions in the system.”
NAM to EPA: Power Plant Rule Repeal Is Only the First Step
The Environmental Protection Agency’s move to repeal the previous administration’s 2024 Power Plant Rule is a positive one for manufacturing in the U.S.—but to truly unleash American energy’s potential, we need permitting reform, too, the NAM told the EPA this week.
What’s going on: In June, the EPA proposed a rule to repeal the previous administration’s 2024 greenhouse gas emissions regulations for certain traditional power plants.
- “Manufacturers commend the EPA for acknowledging the unworkability of the previous administration’s rule,” NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen told EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin on Tuesday.
- Repeal of the 2024 rule is a crucial start in getting “as much electricity generation online as possible,” Phalen continued. “But without comprehensive permitting reform to enable the buildout of new and modernized plants of all types in a timely manner, including traditional generation and plants using lower emissions technologies like [carbon capture and sequestration] and hydrogen, there is a serious risk we fall short of our energy generation needs.”
Why it makes sense: The NAM laid out its primary reasons for supporting the proposed rescission, which include the following:
- The requirement that some achieve a 90% carbon capture rate was arbitrary and unfeasible given that carbon capture and sequestration technology is not yet at commercial scale.
- The plant closures that would result from the rule’s implementation would threaten grid reliability.
No relief without reform: Repealing the 2024 rule keeps many traditional plants online, which is a must as the national energy appetite grows due to data center expansion, Phalen said. Still, there are further steps we must take—and soon.
- “These include consolidating the permitting processes and putting enforceable deadlines for the siting of new energy projects and their infrastructure; speeding up the approval process for transmission, distribution and electrical generation projects; enacting commonsense guardrails on judicial review to ensure a speedy process that results in definitive decisions for all projects; and committing to developing our resources to strengthen U.S. supply chains for the energy infrastructure vital to national security.”