News

Antora Energy has an energy storage solution that could transform American manufacturing.

Antora builds thermal batteries that draw in locally produced electricity when it’s cheap and plentiful, converting it into heat stored in solid blocks of carbon. That energy can be delivered 24/7 to manufacturers as affordable, reliable energy. It’s a solution that is both modular and scalable, capable of serving small and large manufacturers alike.

• “We’re taking local energy from sources that are already near factories, at times when nobody else wants it and it would otherwise be wasted, and delivering it to American manufacturers,” said Antora Chief Operations Officer Justin Briggs. “It helps the factory become more competitive and stabilizes the local grid.”

Promoting U.S. energy: Antora’s batteries are manufactured in the U.S., using a domestic supply chain that avoids reliance on critical minerals (which must often be imported from China).

• The core of the battery is a form of inexpensive, low- to medium-grade graphite that is often a byproduct of coal mining or petroleum refining—an abundant resource across the U.S.
• “This is an opportunity to build a new technology class in the United States, with American materials and American supply chains,” said Briggs. “From the very beginning, we can build in America to support U.S. manufacturers.”

Creating jobs: The company is excited about the opportunity to create jobs in the United States—both at Antora itself and at the factories it supports.

• “We’re currently operating our first factory—a thermal battery gigafactory in San Jose, California—but that’s just the beginning,” said Briggs. “We’re already looking at a second factory, and more beyond that. We’re talking about being able to create a tremendous number of jobs around manufacturing hubs in the U.S.”

Leading a renaissance: Antora sees the chance not only to build a new industry, but also to help support the next generation of American manufacturing and global technological leadership.

• “[The U.S. has] a chance for a renaissance—to tap into these domestic, abundant energy resources and support manufacturing industries, from concrete and steel to chips and data centers,” said Briggs. “These are all sectors that need energy, and we can supply it cost-effectively.”

Overcoming hurdles: Briggs notes that electricity markets have been around for a long time—and as a result, regulatory hurdles designed by long-ago policymakers can get in the way of this new technology.

• “The rules that govern electricity markets were not designed to contemplate scenarios like this one,” said Briggs. “Thermal batteries bring huge benefits to industry and the electric grid, but it can be hard to do from a regulatory perspective. We’re working with regulators to open up markets to support these great project opportunities.”
• “We’re just trying to make sure there aren’t antiquated rules in the way, so we can help make American industry more competitive.”

The bottom line: “This is an opportunity to drive a resurgence in American manufacturing through cheap energy,” said Briggs. “We’re putting this energy to use to repower American industry.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has put limits on a procedural requirement that has become a major roadblock for infrastructure and energy projects: environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act.

The background: The predecessor of substantive statutes like the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts, NEPA is the “the single most litigated environmental statute,” NAM Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Erica Klenicki told us.

• In this case, local government and environmental groups brought a NEPA challenge to the Surface Transportation Board’s approval of an 88-mile rail line in Utah’s Uinta Basin, which would connect to the national rail network and carry crude oil to refinery markets along the Gulf Coast.
• The board approved the project after issuing a comprehensive, 3,600 page environmental impact statement under NEPA.
• But that wasn’t enough—the D.C. Circuit blocked the board’s approval, ruling that its exhaustive analysis failed to consider the repercussions of more oil production made possible by the rail line. It contended that the board should have considered the potential impact of increased oil refining on Gulf coast communities thousands of miles away—even though the board had no power at all to control for those effects.

The issue: The NAM filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court to reject the premise adopted by the D.C. Circuit—that NEPA requires agencies to analyze the effects of upstream or downstream projects over which they do not exercise regulatory authority.

• Yesterday, the justices ruled 8–0 (Justice Neil Gorsuch recused himself) that the board did not have to consider such sweeping effects when evaluating whether to approve a project.

What they said: “NEPA is a procedural cross-check, not a substantive roadblock,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote . “The goal of the law is to inform agency decision-making, not to paralyze it.”

• “Courts should review an agency’s [environmental impact statement] to check that it addresses the environmental effects of the project at hand. The EIS need not address the effects of separate projects,” Kavanaugh wrote. “In conducting that review, courts should afford substantial deference to the agency as to the scope and contents of the EIS.”

The NAM’s advocacy: The NAM has been a tireless proponent of limiting regulatory overreach, especially the out-of-control permitting process that strangles important new infrastructure and energy projects.

• “The congressional intent behind NEPA when it was passed was to make sure a specific project could be reviewed for its environmental impact—not to slow down progress on important economic growth,” said NAM Director of Energy and Resources Policy Michael Davin. “The U.S. should learn from other nations and review projects for environmental impacts without taking years and years to approve them.”

The NAM’s Q2 Manufacturers’ Outlook Survey, released today, shows that manufacturers’ optimism about the future is dropping precipitously.

The headline number: Only 55.4% of respondents report a positive outlook for their companies—a nearly 15-percentage-point drop from Q1 and the lowest level since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in Q2 of 2020.

• Manufacturers do have a prescription for renewed confidence, however, as 85.4% of respondents believe Congress should preserve pro-growth tax policies in response to trade uncertainty.

Worried about trade: Trade uncertainty remained the top business concern for the second consecutive quarter, cited by 77.0% of respondents.

• Almost as alarming is the increase in raw material costs, which was cited by 66.1% of respondents.

The NAM says: “These numbers are yet another indicator that manufacturers need increased policy certainty. Congress must act urgently to preserve tax reform and empower manufacturers to make the long-term investments that drive the American economy,” said NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons.

• “The stakes are high: preserving tax reform will prevent the loss of 6 million jobs and avoid a $1 trillion hit to the economy—that’s why manufacturers are calling on the Senate to preserve pro-manufacturing tax policies from the House-passed reconciliation bill, while also taking steps to ensure the final package is maximally beneficial for our industry.”
• “Pro-manufacturing tax policies are a critical component of a comprehensive manufacturing strategy; this quarter’s results also show that manufacturers need a strategic approach to trade policy that allows our industry to reduce costs and access the inputs we need to make things in America.”

President Trump signed several executive orders on Friday that call for the reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and will speed up the permitting of new reactors in the U.S. (CNBC).

What’s involved: “Trump said Friday the orders focus on small, advanced reactors that are viewed by many in the industry as the future. But the president also said his administration supports building large plants.”

• “We’re also talking about the big plants—the very, very big, the biggest,” Trump said. “We’re going to be doing them also.”

Going faster: Building new power plants has been a tedious effort thanks to the long licensing and regulatory approval processes.

• Yet the appetite for more nuclear power is there, thanks to the electricity demand from the data centers powering the AI revolution.
• “Three Mile Island is expected to return to service with financial support from Microsoft . . . and Alphabet and Amazon are investing in small, advanced reactors,” CNBC noted.

More uranium: The EOs also aim to boost uranium mining in the U.S. and to increase domestic enrichment and processing capacity, according to an administration official.

• In addition, the orders also “aim to speed up reactor testing at the Department of Energy’s national laboratories.”

The NAM says: “These actions mark an important and timely step toward unleashing American energy dominance safely and responsibly. Nuclear-generated power is an important part of an all-of-the-above energy strategy, which is necessary to meet the power needs of a growing manufacturing sector, and the nuclear fuel supply chain is a critical manufacturing industry that we need to bring home,” said NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons.

• “Rebalancing regulations and expediting permitting reform to unleash American energy are key pillars of a comprehensive manufacturing strategy that Congress must act on so manufacturers can grow, hire and compete—and these orders reflect that vision by reforming the licensing and permitting systems that place burdens on manufacturers.”
• “The NAM looks forward to working closely with the National Energy Dominance Council, under the leadership of Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, as well as Congress to ensure these policies translate into durable results for manufacturers.”

A big majority of manufacturers expect AI to become essential to their operations by 2030—but they need policymakers to support all that growth and innovation, as a new report from the Manufacturing Leadership Council, the NAM’s digital transformation division, lays out.

By the numbers: The report found that 51% of manufacturers already use AI in their operations.

• Meanwhile, 61% expect investment in AI to increase by 2027.
• That number only grows as manufacturers look further into the future. By 2030, 80% say AI will be essential to growing or maintaining their business.

Current barriers: Right now, manufacturers say some barriers prevent them from implementing AI to its fullest potential.

• They name data quality and availability as the top challenges, with 65% of respondents reporting they lack the right data for AI applications and 62% citing data that is unstructured or poorly formatted.

The policy angle: Manufacturers don’t just need to overcome the technical, logistical or workforce challenges of rolling out AI solutions—challenges that include everything from modernizing data architectures to upskilling and training workers on new tools. They also need a pro-growth policy framework, which the NAM has supplied for policymakers. The key recommendations are:

• Adopt a pro-AI regulatory approach: Given the growing number and variety of use cases of AI in manufacturing, the industry requires an optimized regulatory environment.
• Develop the manufacturing workforce of the AI age: Policymakers should support training programs, career and technical education institutions and STEM education and immigration. According to the MLC’s report, 82% of manufacturers cite a lack of AI-ready skills as the top workforce challenge.
• Advance energy and permitting reform: AI needs a lot of power, and energy and permitting reform is necessary to support AI-related data center growth.
• Protect personal data: Congress should pass a comprehensive privacy law that preempts state laws, provides liability protections that prevent frivolous litigation and adopts a risk-based approach that enables innovation and AI.
• Support U.S. manufacturing of AI chips: Policymakers should execute funding agreements with chip manufacturers and renew the Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit.
• Incentivize U.S. AI innovation: Congress must pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that preserves pro-manufacturing tax policies.

Manufacturers say: “AI continues to drive innovation, efficiency and better outcomes for manufacturers across America. From accelerating drug discovery and development to optimizing manufacturing operations, AI enables companies to make smarter, faster and more impactful decisions,” said Johnson & Johnson Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Operations and Risk Officer and NAM Board Chair Kathy Wengel.

• “Importantly, AI empowers employees at all levels, when we equip them with the knowledge and understanding to help shape the implementation of these new technologies. AI is proving to be an essential partner on the shop floor, and we must continue to ensure manufacturing employees have the skills they need to build the future of our industry.”

The last word: “The latest report from the MLC reinforces the need for modernized, agile, pro-manufacturing AI policy solutions, so that manufacturers can continue to innovate on shop floors across America,” said NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons.

• “Manufacturers welcomed President Trump’s early commitment to maintaining and advancing America’s global AI dominance, and we look forward to continuing to champion American AI leadership and manufacturing in America, which starts with adopting a pro-AI regulatory framework and pursuing policies that bolster innovation.”

The U.S. Court of International Trade, which hears disputes involving international trade and customs laws, struck down President Donald Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs yesterday.

What happened: In a unanimous opinion, the three-judge panel found that the IEEPA “does not authorize the President to impose unbounded tariffs” and the administration exceeded its authority in imposing the “reciprocal” and fentanyl IEEPA tariffs.

What it means: The finding strikes down the 10% baseline additional “reciprocal” tariffs announced on April 2 as well as the “reciprocal” tariffs of between 20% and 50% on another 65 or so trading partners with which the U.S. runs trade deficits.

• Those tariffs that are currently “paused” were scheduled to snap back into place on July 9 if trade deals were not reached by then.
• The court further nullified the 25% fentanyl IEEPA tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico and the 20% fentanyl IEEPA tariff on products from China.

Refunds? The court also ordered that the IEEPA tariffs collected so far be “vacated,” raising questions about possible refunds.

• The court gave Customs and Border Patrol 10 days to implement the ruling, but the U.S. government may ask for a stay of enforcement—relieving the government of obligation to issue refunds—pending appeal, which could result in CBP continuing to collect but not liquidate tariffs.

An appeal: The DOJ quickly filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and said that it may ask the Supreme Court to pause the ruling as soon as Friday.

Section 232: The ruling does not affect other tariffs the administration has or might impose under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 on national security grounds.

• NAM filed comments on recent Section 232 tariff investigations into imports of copper, lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals. It also plans to file comments on aerospace.

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal by a Native American group that would have halted the development of North America’s largest copper mine, a partnership between Rio Tinto and BHP Group (Bloomberg, subscription).

The situation: The appeal attempted to prevent the transfer of federal land to the mining project, due to the religious significance of one area to some members of the San Carlos Apache Tribe.

Why it matters: This site is the third-largest known copper deposit in the world and will be instrumental in the efforts—led by the Trump administration and backed by the NAM—to increase domestic sources of key minerals.

• “Projects such as Resolution have been tied up in legal challenges for years, making the U.S. one of the most challenging places to develop new mines,” Bloomberg noted.

The benefits: “The companies say the mine would supply as much as 25% of U.S. demand and as much as 40 billion pounds of copper over 40 years amid a soaring need for the metal in electric vehicles.”

Next steps: The land transfer may occur as soon as June 16, once the U.S. Forest Service issues a mandatory draft environmental impact statement and record of decision. The companies are still awaiting several federal, state and local permits, however.

The NAM says: “Manufacturers are eager for Resolution Copper to get underway to support strong domestic supply chains of critical materials after years of permitting delays, as well as to create thousands of high-paying jobs,” said NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen. “The U.S. has an acute need for more mineral production and processing capacity. Policymakers should work to support many more such projects.”

Manufacturers are looking for a return to common sense by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections held a hearing on Thursday titled “Reclaiming OSHA’s Mission: Ensuring Safety Without Overreach,” at which President of CRH Americas Materials’ Northeast Division Jake Parson represented the NAM’s and manufacturers’ positions.

The big picture: “If we want to grow manufacturing in the U.S., we need to rebalance regulations that cost manufacturers $350 billion every year. This is money that could be spent on hiring people, building new facilities and creating new products,” Parson said.

• “OSHA has put forward costly rules that ignore the complexity of U.S. manufacturing.”

One regulation: “One problematic regulation is the proposed heat rule. A one-size-fits-all heat standard ignores the work manufacturers already do to protect our employees, and it ignores the unique ways in which it is done,” said Parson.

• Rules that make sense for one region do not make sense for another, he noted.
• “During my time leading an asphalt production and paving business in Texas, I saw firsthand how extreme heat impacts our teams and how local expertise and adaptive safety measures are critical. Now, overseeing similar operations in the Northeast, I face a completely different climate and set of challenges. Any standard must reflect the realities of our industry and the diverse environments in which we operate.”
• “The proposed rule imposes significant mandates on manufacturers—without fully grappling with or understanding whether they are feasible or cost effective. The result would be reduced production and ultimately fewer jobs,” Parson warned.

The NAM’s involvement: The NAM has long advocated for commonsense OSHA regulations that protect workers while accurately accounting for manufacturers’ extant safety procedures and operational needs.

• The NAM weighed in on the heat rule back in January, advising OSHA that “the NAM recommends that OSHA provide additional flexibility that reflects the breadth of work environments and company approaches to the issues,” among other changes.
• In the hearing Thursday, policymakers also discussed the worker walkaround rule finalized by the Biden Labor Department last spring. The NAM is suing to block this overreaching and legally dubious regulation that does nothing to improve safety.

The last word: “The NAM continues to bring manufacturers’ voices to policymakers as they decide how best to protect workers and ensure manufacturing competitiveness,” said NAM Director of Transportation, Infrastructure and Labor Policy Max Hyman. “Real-world experiences from the shop floor help craft policy that empowers employees and grows the economy.”

The NAM is continuing to advise policymakers on the opportunities and hurdles facing the industry as it seeks to support AI innovation. This week, the NAM responded to a request for information from the House’s AI and Energy Working Group, led by Rep. Julie Fedorchak (R-ND), addressing concerns about “American energy dominance and artificial intelligence’s energy demands, securing the energy grid and outpacing and outcompeting China.”

The big picture: “With the digitalization of manufacturing … manufacturers are increasingly dependent on a robust network of cutting-edge data centers for the smooth execution of their core business operations. AI in particular has become integral to modern manufacturing, as it increasingly transforms and supports a multitude of aspects of manufacturing, from product design to shop floor operations to supply chain management.”

• “Manufacturers also rely on the same energy sources as data centers to power their operations. As demand grows and supply remains relatively static, there is a pressing need to use all policy levers available to ensure sufficient, reliable, resilient and affordable energy for all users.”

Permitting reform: The NAM’s first recommendation to the working group was that policymakers must enact permitting reform—and fast. “Wood Mackenzie has predicted that U.S. demand for power could increase by 15% by the end of this decade,” the NAM noted.

• The NAM advised policymakers to take certain crucial steps, including expediting judicial review, accelerating the permit process for energy infrastructure—including more transmission and distribution lines, pipelines and permanent carbon sequestration sites—and providing greater regulatory certainty.

A secure electric grid: Manufacturers are concerned about service disruptions caused by severe weather and aging infrastructure, the NAM said. “A reliable, resilient modern grid is required to enable the historic growth in data centers—which in turn can contribute to manufacturing growth.”

• The NAM recommended the build-out of natural gas generation and transportation infrastructure, as well as the permitting and construction of more transmission and distribution, as mentioned above.

The AI future: Manufacturers also recognize the importance of enabling AI innovation and the risks of imposing an overly restrictive regulatory regime on the fast-evolving technology.

• To that end, the NAM recommended “a regulatory approach that is based on reviews of existing regulations before enacting new ones … a strategy of international engagement that keeps foreign markets open to the use of American AI … and developing the manufacturing workforce of the AI age by supporting science, technology, engineering and mathematics education programs at all levels,” among other policies.

The last word: “Maintaining a favorable policy environment for AI will provide certainty to the private sector, which in turn will spur additional multibillion-dollar investments in U.S. manufacturing and innovation,” said NAM Managing Vice President of Policy Charles Crain.

The Environmental Protection Agency has announced that it will reconsider certain aspects of the Biden administration’s rule setting limits on PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, in drinking water—while leaving in place unworkable standards for two PFAS (The Washington Post, subscription).

Encouraging progress: The agency plans to reconsider regulatory determination for PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and PFBS following calls by the NAM to rescind the “blatantly unlawful” standards. The EPA also will extend its compliance deadline for PFOA and PFOS from 2029 to 2031, another top NAM ask.

More to be done: NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons made clear that the EPA’s decision to maintain the previous administration’s standards for PFOA and PFAS “go against the Trump administration’s goal to make the U.S. the best place to build, grow and create jobs.”

The NAM’s involvement: The NAM opposed these standards when they were instituted, arguing that the timeline for implementation was too swift, as many of these chemicals are key manufacturing additives that do not yet have replacements.

• The NAM also challenged the rule in court, asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to overturn the rule due to the EPA’s failure to follow the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act, including its reliance on a deeply flawed cost-benefit analysis and deficient feasibility analysis.

The NAM says: “We’re encouraged that the EPA has listened to the voices of manufacturers and extended the compliance deadline for unworkable national primary drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS and committed to reconsidering the blatantly unlawful regulatory determinations for several other PFAS compounds,” Timmons said.

• “However, the Biden-era standards for PFOA and PFOS are deeply flawed, the costs they impose exceed any demonstrable benefit and the industries they harm include those vital to our national interests, including semiconductors, telecommunications and defense systems.”
• “We don’t have to choose between supporting manufacturing and clean water in our communities.”