Input Stories

Following the CMA 2026 Winter Leadership Conference, the NAM announced new leadership for its Council of Manufacturing Associations. Corey Rosenbusch, president and CEO of The Fertilizer Institute, will take over as chair, and Kelly Mariotti, president and CEO of the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, will serve as vice chair.

The background: The CMA is made up of over 200 industry-specific manufacturing associations representing 130,000 companies and works with the NAM to build partnership and collaboration across the manufacturing industry and larger business community.

What they’re saying: “Manufacturers are doing what we’ve always done: pioneering innovation, powering the economy and responding to dynamic markets,” said Rosenbusch.

• “There’s no better time to be in manufacturing, and I’m thrilled—and honored—to lead the CMA as manufacturers navigate a new era in our industry. The mission of the CMA has never been more important. I hope that in this position I can illustrate the vital role manufacturing plays across every segment of the U.S. economy.”

The NAM says: “Corey and Kelly are proven, respected leaders, and both of them have demonstrated a deep dedication to the CMA’s mission and growth,” said NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons.

• “I’m grateful they’ve agreed to step into these leadership roles during a pivotal time for our industry. With Corey and Kelly’s partnership, manufacturers will build on our momentum after our recent success in securing pro-growth tax reform—and we will advance a comprehensive manufacturing strategy that unlocks opportunities for every sector represented in the CMA and for every manufacturer across the United States.”

Other appointments: The CMA also appointed new members to the 2026 board:

• Frank Hugelmeyer, president and CEO, National Marine Manufacturers Association
• Matt Seaholm, president and CEO, The Plastics Industry Association
• Megan Tanel, president and CEO, Association of Equipment Manufacturers

Permitting reform, reliable power sources and what’s next for U.S. energy were the topics of the day on a recent episode of the GPA Midstream Association’s “Let’s Clear the Air” podcast featuring NAM Director of Energy and Resources Policy Mike Davin.

What’s going on: “Under the previous administration, we saw what we call an onslaught of regulatory activity,” Davin told show hosts Stuart Saulters, Adam Murray and Bryan Nix on the episode titled “Peanut Butter, Steel and Semiconductors Share the Same Problem with NAM’s Mike Davin.”

• “[W]ith this new administration, we’ve seen a lot of great progress and appreciate their focus and emphasis on the regulatory landscape.”
• But revising the process by which manufacturers obtain permits for their energy and infrastructure projects—and shortening the length of time it takes—is a continued NAM priority, Davin said, and one on which the organization, in collaboration with legislators, continues to work.

Energy dominance: “When President Trump came in, he set up the National Energy Dominance Council—really putting an emphasis on not just energy security or energy independence, but energy dominance,” Davin said.

• Its goal is “to unleash our members to be able to produce, to be able to use, to be able to contribute to a more energy-secure country. Because if we’re able to control our destiny with energy, that helps us address problems or challenges … with data center growth, greater utilization of artificial intelligence.”
• To achieve that dominance as well as dominance in AI, Davin went on, the NAM has said we need four “pillars”: permitting reform; increased energy production and efficiency; grid reliability, affordability and resiliency; and the right regulatory environment.

What’s next? With investments in workforce development and forward movement on permitting reform in 2026, “the sky’s the limit” for where manufacturers in the U.S. could be a year from now, Davin said.

• In January 2027, “I would love to come back and say, ‘We got what we needed and now we’re rolling up our sleeves and we’re getting to work.’”

With just six months before the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement’s review, NAM advocacy has kicked into high gear. NAM experts took a trip to Mexico City last week for a flurry of high-level trade talks and events.

The visit: The NAM traveled to Mexico City for the APEC Alliance for Supply Chain Connectivity (A2C2) Regional Roundtable, co-led by the U.S. Trade Representative, which featured U.S. government staff, international officials, academics and industry representatives discussing the future of a digitized customs process.

• Following the event, the NAM delegation—which included NAM Director of International Policy Kevin Doyle and NAM Senior Director of International Policy Anne Collett—took part in multiple USMCA-related events to share the policy priorities of manufacturers in the U.S.

The details: The events included a roundtable hosted by the American Chemistry Council and its Mexican and Canadian counterparts, a government–industry talk with the North American Strategy for Competitiveness hosted by the Canadian Embassy in Mexico City and a panel discussion with the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico.

Out of the spotlight: The NAM also engaged in discussions with Mexican officials and trade organizations.

• These included conversations with business association CONCAMIN and representatives for the Mexican business community as well as senior officials in the Mexican Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
• The NAM also visited the newly opened U.S. Embassy in Mexico City to meet with U.S. officials on the ground in Mexico, as well as a visiting delegation of senators and members of Parliament from Canada.

Manufacturers’ voice: Throughout the trip, the NAM highlighted top trade priorities for manufacturers, including strengthening and improving the USMCA and ensuring manufacturers can secure critical industrial inputs to power factory floors across the U.S.

Mergers and acquisitions in the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical industry are critically important to the development and manufacturing of new treatments, the NAM said at a House Judiciary Committee staff briefing Wednesday.

To incentivize innovation that helps patients and strengthens the American economy, U.S. antitrust policies must preserve M&A—a critical pathway for drug development.

What’s going on: The life sciences industry, and drug development in particular, is unique among sectors, as 90% of drugs that enter trials never get approved. M&A is a key avenue for biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies seeking to bring new treatments to patients, NAM Managing Vice President of Policy Charles Crain, who moderated the discussion, told the audience.

M&A to the rescue: M&A activity—typically when one company acquires another—provides the financial resources and expertise needed to commercialize new drugs, according to a recent study co-authored by Dr. Anand Krishnamurthy, an economist and principal at Cornerstone Research and a panelist at the event.

• “We find that drug projects that undergo M&A have a higher likelihood of launching relative to drug products that do not,” the study reads, in part.
• During the briefing, representatives from Life Sciences Pennsylvania and BioNJ recounted how larger companies have helped life sciences startups in their states obtain regulatory approval and deliver novel treatments to patients.

Why they work: Early-stage life sciences firms frequently depend on outside investment to bring new drugs through the lengthy clinical stage process, Crain said.

• “M&A acts as an anticipated exit point for investors in these startups and is critical to attracting this funding,” he said, adding that it also “allows the companies to more freely pursue groundbreaking therapeutic innovation.”

Without M&A in life sciences: Policies that hamstring this crucial funding mechanism in the life sciences could derail innovation, potentially damaging people’s health and costing lives down the line. For the life sciences industry, that is simply too high of a price.

At Oskaloosa Middle School in Iowa, the future of manufacturing is taking shape today. The Quest for the Crystal of Innovation (also known as the Innovators Quest)—a gamified experience that introduces students to modern manufacturing careers—is engaging students in hands-on challenges in robotics, circuitry and teamwork.

In an age where classrooms increasingly rely on digital learning, this active, physical experience helped some students uncover new strengths and interests—potentially leading to careers that will last a lifetime.

The quest: Developed by the Manufacturing Institute, the NAM’s workforce development and education affiliate, thanks to a grant from American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Innovators Quest is made up of four “realms” laid out in a board game format.

• These realms include hands-on building challenges that introduce students to core manufacturing skills, like problem-solving, teamwork and communication.
• As they seek to recover the “Crystal of Innovation,” students in grades 4 through 9 try their hands at 3D printing, robotics and other cutting-edge manufacturing concepts.

Manufacturers’ involvement: Manufacturers, associations, workforce partners and community engagement groups can sponsor Innovators Quest kits, which they can use at schools, summer camps, local community events, MFG Day events, company family days and more.

• By facilitating the experience, manufacturers serve as the connector between Innovators Quest and real-world manufacturing.

The reception: “It’s been fun to see the ones who really light up,” said Kristen McMains, talent outreach specialist at Musco Lighting, who brought the experience to Oskaloosa’s classroom. “Teachers have told us, ‘That student doesn’t usually engage like this,’ and suddenly, they’re the one leading their group.”

• “I learned that I’m pretty good with wires and building stuff,” said Kolter Ozinga, an 8th grader who participated in the experience. “I like electrical work and teamwork.”

The big picture: Innovators Quest comes at a critical time for the manufacturing workforce. A 2024 study by the MI and Deloitte projected that as many as 1.9 million manufacturing jobs could be left unfilled by 2033, when current 5th graders will be graduating high school. Today’s youth could be key to filling this talent gap—if they know the careers are out there.

• “Kids can’t be what they can’t see,” said MI President and Executive Director Carolyn Lee. “By sparking their interest in skills used in modern manufacturing, this student engagement activity illustrates the limitless possibilities of the many careers in our industry. The time to invest in our future workforce is now.”

Get involved: Interested in bringing Innovators Quest to your community? The MI is accepting orders for Innovators Quest kits through Jan. 31. Learn more about the kit and place your order today.

The Bethesda, Maryland–based Centrus Energy Corp. will get an injection of $900 million from the Department of Energy to expand enrichment operations at its Ohio and Tennessee facilities (OilPrice.com).

What’s going on: The U.S.-owned, U.S.-controlled uranium enrichment company announced earlier this month that it had been chosen by the DOE for a $900 million task order to build out its enrichment and centrifuge manufacturing capabilities at its facilities located in Piketon, Ohio, and Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

• “The competitively awarded funding will support a previously announced multibillion-dollar expansion that includes commercial-scale production of High-Assay, Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), a critical fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors, alongside additional production of conventional low-enriched uranium (LEU) for the existing reactor fleet.”
• Centrus has already begun adding to its workforce in anticipation of the project, which is forecast to create about 1,000 construction jobs and 300 permanent jobs in Ohio and hundreds of new direct jobs in Tennessee.

Why it’s important: There is growing bipartisan support to shore up domestic uranium enrichment to power nuclear reactors.

• Russia remains a dominant global supplier of enrichment capacity, particularly for HALEU, which has become a strategic vulnerability as advanced reactor projects move closer to deployment.

NAM involvement: The NAM is one of the foremost advocates for strengthening nuclear power in the U.S. Last year, the NAM pressed Energy Secretary Chris Wright to allocate this funding to spur “the Department of Energy’s collaboration with the private sector to restore American leadership in producing nuclear fuel.” Timmons cited Centrus as an important example and urged further investment in the domestic nuclear supply chain.

The details: Under the DOE order, Centrus will install additional centrifuge cascades to increase HALEU output and produce LEU feedstock for those cascades, as well as expand LEU volumes for commercial utilities and support national security mandates.

• The first of the new capacity will come in 2029, the company said.
• In addition to the $900 million, the task order includes possible funding, at the DOE’s discretion, of up to $170 million for HALEU production and delivery, bringing the total potential value to about $1.07 billion.

The NAM says: “Increasing domestic supplies of nuclear fuel will help the U.S. boost its output of nuclear power, which is crucial for manufacturers to continue to access stable, clean and abundant baseload power in the U.S.,” said NAM Director of Energy and Resources Policy Michael Davin.

• “Domestic sources of nuclear fuel and secure supply chains will also allow the U.S. to avoid relying on foreign adversaries to fuel its nuclear fleet.”

In a recent survey report published by the University of Delaware’s Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance and supported by the NAM, public companies—including many NAM members—voiced concern about the politicization of the shareholder proposal process.

• They also exppessed support for updating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules to tighten minimum ownership requirements and the support thresholds for resubmitted proposals.

The findings: Overall, company representatives indicated dissatisfaction with the misuse of the proposal process, with 79% of respondents agreeing that proposals are primarily used to promote activists’ political and social views.

• Public companies reported that they incur significant costs, primarily on outside counsel fees, in responding to shareholder proposals.
• A majority of corporate respondents said they spend more than $100,000 each year, about 25% said they spend at least $500,000, and 11% reported that they spend more than $1 million.

The fixes: Sixty-one percent of respondents supported replacing the current $2,000 minimum ownership threshold for long-term investors with a percentage requirement (such as 1% or more of a company’s outstanding shares), while 41% called for increasing the minimum dollar stake to $1 million or more.

• Almost 86% of company representatives favored increasing the minimum support levels required for shareholders to resubmit the same proposal in subsequent years. Respondents supported requirements of 10% (after year one), 20% (after year two) and 40% (after year three). The current thresholds are 5%, 15% and 25%, respectively.

Why it’s important: The SEC is considering proposing new rules to govern the shareholder proposal process. The NAM has submitted recommendations to the SEC to address the politicization of the proposal process and to reduce costs for manufacturers.

• “The responses to the Weinberg Center survey indicate that reforms are needed to improve the proposal process, which has been hijacked by professional shareholder proponents that seek to force companies to act according to their own narrow interests rather than to promote long-term investor returns,” said NAM Senior Director of Corporate Finance Policy Ted Allen.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee has approved seven manufacturer-supported Clean Air Act–related measures, thanks in part to NAM advocacy.

What’s going on: The approved measures—which constitute the most comprehensive revision to the CAA in over three decades—“will foster our industry’s ongoing efforts to improve air quality while preventing unnecessary burdens that reduce economic growth and tax revenues that are vital to local communities,” NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Chris Phalen and NAM Director of Energy and Resources Policy Mike Davin told Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie (R-KY) and Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-NJ) ahead of a full markup Wednesday morning.

• The action follows NAM-backed approval of the measures last month by the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on the Environment.

Why it’s crucial: There are “mounting permitting challenges facing American businesses under increasingly unattainable air quality standards,” the NAM said. “Unless addressed, these challenges will essentially block permitting approvals for projects critical to economic growth, manufacturing infrastructure and jobs.”

The details: Prior to the hearing, the NAM had called on committee members to “favorably report to the House floor” the following measures specifically:

• The New Source Review Permitting Improvement Act, which would reform the New Source Review program for existing sources by clarifying which types of facility modifications require an owner to obtain an NSR
• The Clean Air and Economic Advancement Reform Act, which would make the National Ambient Air Quality Standards “process more workable for manufacturers,” while keeping regulatory guardrails in place to protect local communities
• The Clean Air and Building Infrastructure Improvement Act, which aims to clarify the preconstruction permit process and compliance requirements
• The Air Permitting Improvements to Protect National Security Act, to establish presidential authority under the CAA to waive the requirement for an advanced manufacturing plant or critical mineral facility to offset increased emissions
• The Fire Improvement and Reforming Exceptional Events Act, which would amend the CAA to mandate revisions to regulations around the review and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by “exceptional events”
• The Reducing and Eliminating Duplicative Environmental Regulations Act, to eliminate the requirement that the Environmental Protection Agency review a project already subject to environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act
• The Foreign Emissions and Nonattainment Clarification for Economic Stability Act, which would amend the CAA to clarify standards for emissions that come from outside the U.S.

Artificial intelligence, the manufacturing labor shortage, training programs and more—all were covered in a recent episode of the “Workforce 4.0” podcast, featuring Manufacturing Institute President and Executive Director Carolyn Lee.

What’s going on: Among the first topics addressed by Lee last week when she chatted with podcast host Ann Wyatt for the episode “Manufacturing Hiring Trends: And What Employers Need To Know In 2026” was the still-persistent concern that AI will “take” jobs from human workers.

• “[W]hen you ask the average manufacturer, especially a large manufacturer, they would say they’ve been working with robotics and automation for many years now,” Lee told Wyatt. “This is not new. … Large language models and generative AI [are] new … but … manufacturers have [always] been at the forefront of technology evolution and innovation, and it has not eliminated all people. I see people wherever I go.”
• In fact, the more widespread automation and other AI applications have become, the more appealing some of the work has become. Lee told the story of a manufacturing worker nearing retirement age who told her, “I’ve been in this sector for 40 years. I’m 65. I want to stay longer because the job is safer. It’s interesting, I’m learning more in the last five years than I’ve learned my entire previous career, and I’m excited for what’s to come.”
• Manufacturers just need to train their workforces on the technology so their teams “are able to evolve” with it.

Humans in demand: Human workers are still very much in demand. In fact, the manufacturing industry still has a dearth of about 400,000 workers—a shortfall that, if current trends continue, will grow to 1.9 million by 2033, Lee said, citing data from a joint MI–Deloitte 2024  report.

• “When we do this updated paper, which will be in ’27, I think it will show a much bigger number because our retirements will have continued … [and] all this domestic investment is going to create new jobs,” she went on. That, coupled with the advancement of AI, will make workforce training—the kind the MI does—and worker upskilling even more important.

FAME-ously crucial: Lee and Wyatt discussed the Federation for Advanced Manufacturing Education (FAME), a national apprenticeship-style training program started in 2010 by Toyota and now run entirely by the MI.

• FAME now has “over 42 chapters in 17 states, training thousands of students in maintenance for an [Advanced Manufacturing Technician] degree,” according to Lee.
• “It is really an employer-led model where the employers are driving that commitment, driving the training, working in concert with community colleges and then local business entities to help support that network,” she said. “And then you’re growing the pool of talent and you’re building practices to solve this together so that we’re not fighting over a shrinking pool; we’re actually growing that pool.”

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued multiple warnings urging consumers to immediately stop using certain imported mattresses that fail mandatory federal flammability standards. The alerts follow a pattern of recent recalls targeting noncompliant products that pose a risk of serious injury or death from fire.

What’s going on: The CPSC recently warned consumers to stop using Crayan mattresses after finding they violated the federal flammability rule, citing a serious fire hazard. The Chinese firm has been uncooperative in the implementation of a June 2025 recall.

• The warning builds on similar action last fall involving Elitespace mattresses, after the noncompliant seller, Foshanshiyiliangjiajukejiyouxiangongsi, of China, doing business as Elitespace Home, failed to recall their product or offer a remedy to consumers.

Dangerous competition: Noncompliant imports undercut responsible manufacturers by avoiding safety requirements, endangering American consumers. Allowing these unsafe products to stay on the market creates dangerous competition, rewarding copycats who cut corners while exposing families to preventable fire risks.

• These recalls demonstrate how appropriate enforcement can help level the playing field and keep consumers safe.

The NAM says: “Manufacturers are committed to keeping American families safe,” said NAM Vice President of Domestic Policy Jake Kuhns. “CPSC oversight of noncompliant products is vital to protecting families and the manufacturers that play by the rules.”