Data sourced from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Census Bureau.
Manufacturing inputs are classified as all goods that fall under the capital goods, industrial supplies, and auto parts end use categories.
Trading to Win
The administration is rightly prioritizing policies to spur more investment and innovation in manufacturing in the U.S.—a goal that manufacturers share. To help manufacturers deliver on a vision of America as a global manufacturing powerhouse, the administration should aggressively pursue zero-for-zero tariff deals with our trading partners.
Manufacturers are offering a clear, actionable agenda to strengthen U.S. manufacturing through common-sense trade policy.
-
1
Go for Zero-for-Zero Tariffs
We’re calling on negotiators to secure better terms for manufacturers by adopting zero-for-zero tariffs for American-made products in our trading partners’ markets. That means they don’t charge us, and we don’t charge them.
-
2
Secure Access to Inputs That Power U.S. Production
More than half of U.S. imports are manufacturing inputs. These include critical minerals, chemicals and machinery essential for making things in America. On the path to zero-for-zero, we urge negotiators not to put tariffs on specific manufacturing inputs we need to make things in America.
-
3
Create American Investment Incentives
If tariffs remain in place, we propose specific incentives, such as tariff rebates for manufacturing companies investing in manufacturing in the U.S. to accelerate the growth of the American industrial base.
U.S. Manufacturing Investment Accelerator Program
To give manufacturers a runway of predictable access to critical materials and leading technologies from reliable suppliers that will accelerate the long-term investments needed to maintain America’s global edge, the NAM is proposing a U.S. Manufacturing Investment Accelerator Program.
Imported critical inputs are necessary for manufacturers to make things in America. If operating at full capacity, the industry could produce 84% of the inputs manufacturers need for production. That means that, at an absolute minimum, 16% of manufacturing inputs must be imported. Tariffs on critical manufacturing inputs dramatically increase the cost of these inputs, which include raw materials as well as equipment and machinery on factory floors across the country.
The accelerator program has two key components:
- First, the administration should utilize existing authorities to issue licenses that act as a manufacturing tariff speed pass. This will allow manufacturers to import critical inputs without the added cost of tariffs, accelerating the industry’s efforts to invest and grow here at home.
- Second, when manufacturers do pay tariffs on must-use, must-import critical inputs, the administration should provide investment accelerator rebates to offset tariff costs for dollars spent to sustain or expand manufacturing investments in the U.S.
1. A Manufacturing Tariff Speed Pass
The administration should implement a general licensing system that grants preapprovals for duty-free imports of inputs and materials necessary for manufacturing activities in the U.S.
How It Works: Self-Certification Under a “General License”
- General licenses would provide preexisting approval for any company meeting the criteria to import qualifying items free of duty.
- Use would be self-determined by eligible parties, subject to U.S. Customs and Border Protection verification.
- The president can direct the Treasury to implement the program under existing authorities.
What Qualifies for a General License?
- Materials, equipment, machinery, and parts used in manufacturing or maintenance.
- Essential raw materials, chemicals, and other inputs in limited supply but needed for U.S. manufacturing.
- Materials for R&D in the U.S.
- Materials transferred intercompany and used for further processing in the U.S.
2. A Manufacturing Investment Accelerator Rebate
The administration should provide a rebate to offset tariff costs when dollars are spent to expand or maintain manufacturing investments in the U.S. The rebate should be available on a rolling basis for actual dollars spent after April 5, 2025.
What Qualifies for a Rebate?
- Dollars spent on new greenfield or brownfield investments.
- Dollars spent on expanding or upgrading existing capacity, including capital improvements and maintenance.
- Dollars spent to add full-time manufacturing employment.
- Dollars spent on R&D in the U.S.
Trade Intelligence Center
Manufacturers across America depend on critical inputs imported from around the world. Increasing the cost of inputs will lead to shrinkage, not growth for American manufacturing.
United States
| Increase in effective tariff rate on manufacturing inputs1 | +15% | ||||||
| Imports of manufacturing inputs2 | $1.1T | ||||||
| Manufacturing output per dollar of inputs imported | $1.40 | ||||||
Top 3 Input Imports
|
|||||||
Domestic Supply of Manufacturers’ Input and Capital Goods Needs
|
|||||||
| Manufacturing GDP | $2.94T |
| Manufacturing employment | 12.7M+ |
+6%
+20%
Estimated Increase in Effective Tariff Rate on Mfg Inputs
1Benchmark date set to Dec. 31, 2024. Updates daily. 22023 import volumes Click here for methodology statement.
Key Facts
56%
of goods imported to the U.S. are manufacturing inputs
1/3
of all imported manufacturing inputs originate in North America
59%
of imports from Mexico are manufacturing inputs
70%
of imports from Canada are manufacturing inputs
% who use imported manufacturing inputs to make things in America
% who use imported manufacturing inputs from USMCA partners
% of those who use inputs from USMCA partners that lack comparably priced domestic sources
Among all manufacturing respondents*
91%
74%
82%
Among small and medium manufacturer respondents**
87%
63%
75%
What Manufacturers Are Saying on Tariffs
Swipe or drag to move the slides
Trump’s first 100 days
Read
NAM's Timmons on NewsNation
Read
Local manufacturer casts wary gaze toward tariffs
Read
Cincinnati's trade-dependent $199B economy braces for tariffs
Read
Timmons Talks Trade, Tax and Regulations in NYC Morning Media Swing
Read
Central Ohio company feeling the impacts of tariffs
Read
Dardas: Tariffs threaten American manufacturers
Read
Drowning in Tariffs, American businesses try to stay afloat
Read
Key Policy Actions
The NAM has made a series of recommendations through formal comments to federal agencies in response to the administration’s recent tariff policy proposals. The NAM cautions against broad tariffs that could disrupt supply chains, increase costs, and undermine the global competitiveness of our member companies, offering alternative paths to accelerate manufacturing in the U.S.
NAM Submission to USTR Reciprocal Tariff FRN March 11 2025
The NAM submitted comments to the USTR offering approaches to new trade negotiations to strengthen America’s economic might in the world, while preserving manufacturers’ ability to access inputs critical to expanding manufacturing at home.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Pharmaceuticals
NAM submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Section 232 investigation into pharmaceutical imports, urging against broad tariffs. NAM emphasized the industry's vital role in U.S. innovation, economic strength, and national security.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Semiconductors
NAM submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Section 232 investigation into semiconductor imports, emphasizing the chips’ essential role in U.S. manufacturing, innovation, and national security. NAM urged against tariffs, advocating instead for policies that promote domestic investment, support global market access, and strengthen alliances to secure semiconductor supply chains.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Critical Minerals
NAM submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Section 232 investigation into critical mineral imports, emphasizing their role in U.S. manufacturing, energy, and defense. NAM urged against tariffs, citing risks to supply chains and competitiveness.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Copper
NAM submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Section 232 copper import investigation, highlighting copper’s essential role in manufacturing and energy—from transformers to data centers—and urging tariff-free access amid supply gaps.
Download PDF
Investigation of China’s Targeting of Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance
The NAM submitted comments to USTR opposing proposed port fees that would raise costs for U.S. manufacturers. While supporting efforts to counter China’s unfair shipbuilding practices, NAM urges targeted solutions that don’t disrupt supply chains or burden American industry.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Timber and Lumber
NAM emphasized the industry's importance to U.S. manufacturing and warned that new tariffs could raise costs and disrupt supply chains.
Download PDF
Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Commercial Aircraft and Jet En
The NAM urges the administration to reject proposed tariffs on aerospace imports, warning they would raise costs, disrupt supply chains, and hurt U.S. competitiveness. Instead, it advocates for tax, regulatory, and workforce reforms to strengthen domestic manufacturing and maintain America’s aerospace leadership.
Download PDFThe Promise of the USMCA
President Trump’s USMCA succeeded in shifting manufacturing imports away from China to North America. In this new phase of U.S. trade policy, strengthening the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement will be critical in helping North America restore balance and combat disruptive, problematic trade practices coming out of other countries, specifically China.
View and download the NAM’s new one pager that assesses the impact and value of U.S imports of manufacturing inputs from North America.
